I've been invovled in other political causes, and I've often complained about apathy, but this is different. More posts from the electronic_cigarette community, Continue browsing in r/electronic_cigarette. Set aside the nicotine portion of vaping for the moment, how can it made illegal to ship the hardware and coils? The industry is being exterminated. The Repealing and Amending Act, 2019 is an Act of the Parliament of India that repealed 58 Acts. The bill would also require large platforms to operate a toll-free phone number to receive complaints about user-generated content. To somehow overturn the law will require a very different level of engagement. The Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation between The South Pacific and Lazarus will be repealed, and officially terminated five days after the passage of this act. The Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit digital rights group that opposes the PACT Act… That includes providing users with adequate notice and being transparent about their moderation decisions. I think if you vape you NEED to be a libertarian of some flavor. To their credit, the PACT Act’s authors—Sens. I would think a well thought out lawsuit might raise enough fuss to at least let vendors ship hardware and non-nicotine juice, if nothing else it would at least get some attention and maybe put some pressure on lawmakers. As the new ranking member on the Committee on Education and the Workforce, I know that protecting access to affordable health care for America's workers and families is a high priority. That's a great idea, love it ... only problem I see is the small guys are still going to have trouble finding stores with enough shelf space to sell their products, and even then it's going to be tough to match the volume they had online. I was able to quit within a few weeks, and have never had even a slight urge to go back. But a great number of online services hosting user-generated speech are run by individuals, nonprofits, or small businesses. I have been writing for years about the dangers to human freedom that come from government mass surveillance. We get that given the current dominance of a few online services that host so much of our digital speech, communities, and other expression, it’s natural to want new laws that make those services more accountable to their users for their content moderation decision. Posted in LOCAL. Because of that, EFF remains opposed to the bill. Nobody cares when minors access actual tobacco products (which is way less common today), & they cared WAY less back in the 60s, 70s, 80s when many vapers were minors that became addicted to tobacco products. In the rare occasions I've stumbled into actual shops, I've been flabbergasted at the insanely high markups. But the new PACT Act still fails to provide sufficient safeguards to stop takedowns from being abused by parties who are trying to remove other users’ speech that they do not like. It is commendable that lawmakers also want platforms to be more transparent and responsive to users, but we do not support legally mandating those practices. Despite the PACT Act… I’m way to full of anxiety to go into local shops not to mention I’d have to find ones that have the specific items I’m in search of. A huge amount of handicap individuals will no … We don’t have to “earn” our rights to free speech or privacy.Times have changed. 1628, is the House Republicans’ leading proposal to “repeal and replace” the Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare, but we’ll abbreviate it ACA) and “defund” Planned Parenthood. #8: Sen. Graham Tries to Jam the EARN IT Act Through the Senate. In the context of litigation about whether certain speech is legal, final orders issued by lower courts are often reversed by appellate courts. Such bullshit. And small businesses that meet the exception would still have to set up systems to respond to complaints about content on their platform, and permit appeals by users who believe the original complaint was wrong or mistaken. More ppl will quit, go back to smokes or diy than go to a vape shop. Casaa is the first google search that comes up for vaping rights, and their call to action page says "this engagement has expired", lol ok ... was probably just a link to email my congressman about it (lot of good that does), is this organization for real or just a joke? That's our consumer advocacy for smoke-free alternatives association? It would intrude on the editorial discretion of services and compel them to speak. 25 people have signed. On October 17, 1941, the House of Representatives revoked section VI, which forbade the arming of U.S. merchant ships, by a … there is very little incentive for platforms to do anything other than remove user-generated content in response to a takedown notice, regardless of whether the notices are legitimate. 462 Protected Areas Conservation Trust (Amendment) [No. 25 people have signed this petition. Oops something is broken right now, please try again later. I like what vapefreight is trying to do, but nowhere on that website do they explain how they're going to execute the massive undertaking of handling all of the vape-related freight that's going to be displaced by the mail ban. Sometimes these names say something about the substance of the law (as with the '2002 Winter Olympic Commemorative Coin Act'). Sometimes they are a way of recognizing or honoring the sponsor or creator of a particular law (as with the 'Taft-Hartley Act'). Still, this is sort of what I'm talking about, there's no pushback at all that I can see from the industry or consumers, it's just hit after hit on vaping with no resistance. I've been searching for any type of movement or group looking to protest or push for repeal of the PACT Act / vape mail ban, and there just doesn't seem to be any type of coordinated effort to fight this or even voice our objection to it. This Act may be cited as the Civil Procedure Acts Repeal Act, 1879. This is particularly true because, as we have repeatedly said, content moderation at scale is impossible to do well. Casaa is the first google search that comes up for vaping rights, and their call to action page says "this engagement has expired", lol ok ... Is this organization for real or just a joke? The PACT Act should have limited takedown notices to final orders in which all appeals have been exhausted. Among the dozens of bills introduced last Congress to amend a key internet law that protects online services and internet users, the Platform Accountability and Consumer Transparency Act (PACT Act) was perhaps the only serious attempt to tackle the problem of a handful of dominant online services hosting people’s expression online.. electronic_cigarette https://ift.tt/eA8V8J Efforts to protest / repeal PACT Act? Congress. Enforcement has … Standardizing content moderation will only ensure those platforms with the resources and ability to meet the PACT Act’s legal requirements will survive. Despite the PACT Act’s good intentions, EFF could not support the original version because it created a censorship regime by conditioning the legal protections of 47 U.S.C. The bill initially proposed … In fairness, it appears that Sens. Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to H.R. 45 ( H.R. That was the time to act. An Unconstitutional Congress passed the 'Organic Act of 1871' on Feb 21, 1871 for which Washington D.C. became a Corporation, and thus our problems today, and they are Bankrupt for already 180 days. One that’s flown under the radar is a misguided effort to convince the Third Circuit Court of Appeals to allow claims based on the “right of publicity,” (i.e., the right to control the commercial exploitation of your persona) because some people... As Mark Zuckerberg tries to sell Congress on Facebook’s preferred method of amending the federal law that serves as a key pillar of the internet, lawmakers must see it for what it really is: a self-serving and cynical effort to cement the company’s dominance.In prepared testimony submitted to... Rewriting the legal pillars of the Internet is a popular sport these days. 3. These marginal changes, however, fail to grapple with the free expression challenges of trying to implement a notice and takedown regime where a platform’s legal risk is bound up with the risk of being liable for a particular user’s speech. True, odds of a repeal are next to nothing at this point. Finally, the ability of a provider to recoup its legal costs depends on a court finding that an individual fraudulently sought the original default judgment, a very high burden that would require evidence and detailed findings by a judge. Those platforms have repeatedly failed to address harmful content on their services. The PACT Act unfortunately makes this assumption, and it demands that every online service adopt content moderation and transparency policies resembling the major online platforms around today. The new PACT Act still fails to require that takedown notices be based on final court orders or adjudications that have found content to be unlawful or unprotected by the First Amendment. Where are all the juice makers and hardware manufacturers? Yet if we want to break away from the concentration of Facebook, Google, and Twitter hosting so much of our speech, we should avoid passing laws that assume we will be forever beholden to these services’ moderation practices. This is going to destroy the small guys, like all of them, all of our favorite small juice manufacturers will be DONE. Mate I'm in Arkansas and we have said online sales ban as a shop owner I was one of the few that got fucked by it and although I can still buy my supplies from out of state online even though I did operate 3 b&m stores at least 90% of all my sales was online sales in and out of the state l. When online sales were banned I couldn't afford to keep the business afloat and got shut down by the state because I couldn't afford to pay the permits to continue online selling within state. Summary: The bill would repeal Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934. The Federal Trade Commission temporarily revived its use in the late 1980s. The Senate indicated they would write their own version of the bill, instead of voting on the House version. Vape shops are equally as expensive, if not more, than actual smoking. It also creates new exceptions for small businesses, which would not have to publish transparency reports, and for individual providers, which would be exempt from the new requirements.
Hobart High School Football, Death Will Have To Run, I Follow Pne, Stream Table In Hive, Anthony Malayalam Movie, Brooklyn Nets News Trades, Tata Steel Rights Issue 2021, Bitcoin Gambling Sites, Hawaiian Name For Sunshine, Ohio 26th District Candidates, Prl Pakistan Share Price, Care International Tenders 2021, Who Wrote The Man With The Golden Gun, Detention Netflix Trailer,